Creating a Rope Bottom Aware Space/Culture – some thoughts based on two years of running Anatomie

I’ve been having really interesting conversation over the past months about how to promote or create a rope bottom aware community/space so I thought I’d write about some of my current thoughts of the subject since this is something I think about a lot running Anatomie.

Screen Shot 2017-06-06 at 00.05.08

1 – Teaching Rope, Not Rigging

I really enjoy thinking about how the language we use influences people’s relationship to rope when they first come in.

We tend to avoid using labels and roles and try to use descriptives as much as possible, such as : ’the person inside/outside the ropes’, ‘rope partner’, ‘to tie/be tied’ etc. We also focus on rope and body manipulation, how to do it in different ways and how those different ways feel on the body.

I feel that this creates an environment where people are free to explore the rope itself as a partnership without having to decide what their relationship to rope is before they’ve tried it. It also means we don’t create assumptions about dynamics right from the start but rather explain that it’s something people can choose to incorporate onto their own rope practice if this feels right. This allows people to explore ropes for themselves and switch if they want to.

It also likely helps that 90% of the time the beginner classes are taught by rope bottoms who tie so the natural tendency is for us to talk a lot about what we like and how things feel.

2 – Pre-Requisites for Rope Bottoms

Our classes have pre-requisites for riggers and rope bottoms alike.

I find that asking rope bottoms to meet certain pre-requisites creates an attitude of personal responsibility and also the sense that rope bottoms are active participants in ropes and that rope bottoming is or can be a skill that one can practice.

This is especially valuable in more advanced classes where the learning process for the rigger is heavily dependent on the rope bottoms’ ability to communicate effectively and recognise nerve or circulation impingement, or more subtle things like placements, and recognising different kinds of pain, their limits etc.

3 – Requesting Presenters Include Rope Bottoming Material

When we book presenters we request that rope bottoming material is provided in the workshop.

The exact wording of our current document is as follows:

> “Our membership is very rope-bottom aware, so we appreciate it when the workshop model has a voice and when the presenters can incorporate rope-bottoming material wherever this feels appropriate.”

This means that any given workshop we put on will have information for rope bottoms as well as riggers.

4 – Avoiding Separate Classes for Rope Bottoms

We don’t tend to teach rigging without models present, so we also don’t teach classes on rope bottoming at the exclusion of riggers.

We feel very strongly that rope is a partnership and both rigging and bottoming relevant information should be taught in conjunction as one cohesive unit rather than delivering the information separately to each side of the equation.

Occasionally we will put on a an event specifically on the topic of rope bottoming, but everyone is allowed/encouraged to attend as the information is relevant for both rigging and bottoming.

5 – Paying the Workshop Model

See here.

All of this is a process and will probably keep evolving as we move on, but these are some of my thoughts on the matter at this point in time.

Thank you for reading. ❤

– Anna Bones.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s